[05:00:07] <navcoin-bot> <mxaddict> @aguycalled I've checked the PR, and looks good, will read more of the code later and might be able to run some tests
[05:04:30] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> @aguycalled on devnet, created 3 qt nodes, 0 -> 1 -> 2. 2 launched with excludevote. Created a proposal with node 1 and voted yes once. Then used node 2 to generate 9 blcoks (also tried with staking). My expectation was that the proposal will pass since that 1 vote shuold mean 100% while the 9 blocked mined by the excludevote node not counted. But the proposal does not pass.
[05:05:03] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> I am updating the stressor script now so i can stress run it tomorrow just to check that the statehash will match.
[05:24:06] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/416000318149754881/765052145686806548/stressor_excludevote.sh
[05:40:11] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/416000318149754881/765056196171268156/stressor_dao_excludevote.sh
[05:48:57] <navcoin-bot> <Goku> Question to this pr: 1. If a new proposal arrives, and it will be ignored until it expires. Will this count as 6 cycles inactivity or 1?  2. Are only proposals counted or also consultations?
[07:59:54] <navcoin-bot> <aguycalled> @Goku if it is ignored and no votes happen at all those cycles are not counted
[08:00:05] <navcoin-bot> <aguycalled> also consultations
[08:23:56] <navcoin-bot> <Goku> Sorry maybe it sounds stupid, but what is then counted?  I mean for the automatic activation of excluding blocks from vote
[08:36:02] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> in my mind that it would mean the excluded nodes when they stake a block, the block is not counted as the 20160 block cycle.
[08:36:26] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> but then when i test the PR, it doesn't seem to work that way
[08:39:17] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> in my mind, if a block cycle has 10 blocks, and if an excluded note staked 3 blocks, the base for that cycle becomes 7 blocks, and the 50% quorum would then mean 3.5 blocks.
[08:50:05] <navcoin-bot> <Goku> Yes is how I see that.  But I mean the auto-activation to exclude. 10 cycle need to pass with a proposal. Will one ignored proposal with 6 cycles, counted as 6 ignored cycles?
[08:50:34] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> accumulated i believe
[08:50:49] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> so yes, and then the next one starts with 7
[08:51:00] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> i haven't tested it though
[08:52:23] <navcoin-bot> <aguycalled> @salmonskinroll how did you create the proposal? gui or rpc?
[08:52:23] <navcoin-bot> <aguycalled> nope, if a proposal is ignored and receives no vote from anyone it is not counted
[08:52:24] <navcoin-bot> <aguycalled> the counter only starts when the first vote in a cycle happens
[08:52:51] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> gui
[08:52:58] <navcoin-bot> <aguycalled> ok let me try
[08:55:26] <navcoin-bot> <Goku> > the counter only starts when the first vote in a cycle happens @aguycalled  What vote? Proposal, payment request, consultation or consensus change?
[08:55:44] <navcoin-bot> <aguycalled> any
[09:31:11] <navcoin-bot> <aguycalled> @salmonskinroll it should be fine now
[09:31:15] <navcoin-bot> <aguycalled> with the last commit
[09:31:21] <navcoin-bot> <aguycalled> thx for helping to test this!
[09:31:51] <navcoin-bot> <salmonskinroll> Sure thing. I'll try it out.
[09:54:20] <navcoin-bot> <Goku> > the counter only starts when the first vote in a cycle happens @aguycalled  And get reseted by a vote. What about votes from a voting address?
[09:54:59] <navcoin-bot> <aguycalled> it would work the same