[12:21:03] @aguycalled I rebuilt with aguycalled-patch-11-1. But now the balance only accounts for the start end window not the full history. [12:21:40] navcoin-cli getaddresshistory '{"addresses":["mktCym3pZdFxzkHfUtunSapMXkEYfHewtP"],"start":213154,"end":213155}' [ { "block": 213154, "txindex": 1, "time": 1595413024, "txid": "50b8f1e22084fa4973dd2f47d500b760a14a27f407aef7049750e2316c87aee1", "address": "mktCym3pZdFxzkHfUtunSapMXkEYfHewtP", "changes": { "balance": 200000000, "stakable": 200000000, "voting_weight": 200000000, [12:21:40] "flags": 1 }, "result": { "balance": 200000000, "stakable": 200000000, "voting_weight": 200000000 } }, { "block": 213155, "txindex": 1, "time": 1595413040, "txid": "14256fea7b908cbb642b66b54a321ff4ae5f8491c7582fa55ac084acd2122692", "address": "mktCym3pZdFxzkHfUtunSapMXkEYfHewtP", "changes": { "balance": 0, "stakable": 200000000, "voting_weight": 0, "flags": 1 }, [12:21:41] "result": { "balance": 200000000, "stakable": 400000000, "voting_weight": 200000000 } } ] [12:29:37] it was missing the patch from the other pr which is now in master [12:29:44] it should work now after i merged [12:29:46] @prodpeak [12:29:49] git pull&&make [12:29:52] thanks [12:38:30] rpc/misc.cpp: In function ‘UniValue getaddresshistory(const UniValue&, bool)’: rpc/misc.cpp:1235:27: error: ‘address’ was not declared in this scope if (balance.count(address) == 0) { ^~~~~~~ rpc/misc.cpp:1235:27: note: suggested alternative: ‘addresses’ if (balance.count(address) == 0) { ^~~~~~~ addresses [12:38:31] rpc/misc.cpp:1239:17: error: ‘address’ was not declared in this scope balance[address].spendable += (*it).second.spendable; ^~~~~~~ rpc/misc.cpp:1239:17: note: suggested alternative: ‘addresses’ balance[address].spendable += (*it).second.spendable; ^~~~~~~ addresses [14:25:23] should be now @prodpeak [16:16:50] @aguycalled I got some free time next few days, need any help on blsCT? [16:16:57] @0x2830 [16:22:18] <0x2830> @mxaddict I am finishing the cpp test units and the last changes before the testnet release, but I haven't looked at the things still not working with Gitian. [16:26:14] Alright, I'll spend a few hours in the next coming days testing the gitian stuff for your branch [16:26:33] I'll create a PR if I fix/find anything [16:27:00] @aguycalled @0x2830 did we decide if we should drop 32bit tests on travis? [16:27:52] i would drop them [16:29:42] I think we can keep gitian 32bit, just the travis tests will need to be dropped [16:30:03] I think might be good to replace the 32bit travis test with a 64bit 20.04 test? [16:31:37] dont we have already 64bit tests? [16:34:31] We do, I mean a simple build and run cpp tests (No functional) [16:34:47] So we can test the travis build on 20.04 ubuntu, as the other tests are still on 18.04 [16:35:04] Similar to what we run with the windows 64bit build [16:35:26] > We do, I mean a simple build and run cpp tests (No functional) @mxaddict ah yes, that sounds good