[04:40:34] https://lunardigitalassets.com/news/security/pivx-and-all-pivx-forks-vulnerable-in-a-pos-exploit-several-chains-already-under-attack/ [05:44:37] it says PIVX and PIVX forks, so this shouldn't include us but wouldn't hurt to do some investigation. [05:52:17] i can't see anything that looks malicious when i check over the top stakers; https://chainz.cryptoid.info/nav/#!extraction [06:26:26] My weekly stake % is 8.37% which is 0.07% lower than https://static-rewards.nav.community/ [06:52:11] On the other hand, my 30 day stake rate is 7.73% but that's because I let my stakebox build it's own blockchain rather than bootstrap. Took many days.Thank god for 4.7.0 😃 [07:58:25] The attack that PIVX and it's forks are under is related to part 2 of the disclosure that happened at the end of last year as detailed in this article: https://medium.com/@dsl_uiuc/fake-stake-attacks-on-chain-based-proof-of-stake-cryptocurrencies-b8b05723f806 [07:58:44] the "Spent Stake" attack [07:58:58] and if you look at the checklist at [07:59:55] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/416000318149754881/610714129015111717/Screen_Shot_2019-08-13_at_5.57.06_PM.png [08:01:22] So if we can take the researcher who unveiled this problem as an accurate source of information, we can say that NavCoin will not be effected by this attack. [09:02:41] this is the bitgreen patch that supposedly patches the spent stake bug https://github.com/bitgreen/bitgreen/pull/54/files [09:16:53] the address from the article: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/pivx/address.dws?DCLsuSttqkWABZkNvVHNbRFxWtTTHXYRMS.htm [16:09:08] i'm in touch with other project's devs. looks like we are not affected [16:15:50] you guys rock [16:16:31] Yea great response. Thanks guys! [22:31:47] hey @mxaddict i was just reading that the magnum wallet supports ledger, i wonder if it will work with your ledger app or there is more to do?