[05:55:07] I have just whipped this up into a page located here: https://byte-reverser.netlify.com/ So anyone testing can easily reverse the hash, [23:09:35] @aguycalled in the propsal there is a version - is this jt a version for the propsal [23:09:36] 11:08:13  listproposals 11:08:13  [ { "version": 2, "hash": "acbf2823330053aac6de110ed6ee0db539be6a23b177f054004861d79945e4d4", "description": "IM LOOOOONNNNNGGGG, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque semper justo ac neque mollis, a cursus nisl placerat. Aliquam ipsum quam, congue vitae vulputate id, ullamcorper vel libero. Phasellus et tristique justo. Curabitur eu porta magna, vitae [23:09:37] auctor libero. Fusce tellus ipsum, aliquet nec consequat ut, dictum eget libero. Maecenas eu velit quam. Nunc ac libero in purus vestibulum feugiat quis nec urna. Donec faucibus consequat dignissim. Donec ornare turpis nec lobortis vestibulum. Vivamus lobortis vel massa ac ultrices. Ut vel eros in elit vehicula luctus vel vitae justo. Praesent quis semper nisi. Vivamus viverra blandit ex. Sed nec fringilla quam. Nulla condimentum rhoncus erat sit [23:09:37] amet vulputate. Phasellus viverra sagittis consequat. Sed dapibus augue ac enim dignissim, at consequat arcu ornare. Vestibulum facilisis pretium aliquet. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "requestedAmount": "0.00001", "notPaidYet": "0.00001", "userPaidFee": "1.00", "paymentAddress": "mgh7HRQU3FkmvhfGprKopFspkzLRMEUe84", "proposalDuration": 36000, "votesYes": 0, "votesNo": 0, [23:09:38] "votingCycle": 0, "status": "pending" } ] [23:10:06] what is jt [23:10:22] sorry *just [23:10:28] yes [23:10:37] proposals and payment requests support versioning [23:10:43] version 1 is classic proposals [23:11:01] ok, so version 1 was the fixe exp date etc [23:11:01] version 2 votings last only 4cycles, duration is relative, etc [23:11:06] yea [23:11:09] cool [23:11:21] what i thought just making sure 😉 [23:14:04] @aguycalled every now and then with generate 100 [23:14:23] timestamp issues [23:14:26] i get ProcessNewBlock, block not accepted (code -32603) [23:14:28] heh [23:14:29] yep [23:14:29] they happen too fast [23:14:35] ok cool [23:14:53] need to do shorter amounts of blocks [23:14:57] o just do 100 again [23:15:03] does not matter if it stops in the middle [23:15:05] right [23:15:08] thanks [23:17:55] think i found an issue [23:19:24] So if you dont vote, and keep generating blocks, the proposal gets stuck at "votingCycle": 5, [23:20:28] as in no votes Y & no votes N [23:20:41] @aguycalled ^ [23:20:53] theres a max of voting cycles [23:23:39] so if it gets to 5 then its finished? [23:23:59] actually it should stop at 4 [23:24:50] from what u say, it looks like cycle 5 is not counting more votes [23:25:03] yea [23:25:07] just for aesthetic reasons it should still show 4 [23:25:10] instead of 5 [23:25:34] yea and maybe have a different status. [23:25:43] it should move to expired [23:25:48] yep [23:26:10] but it doesnt [23:26:14] "proposalDuration": 36000, "votesYes": 0, "votesNo": 0, "votingCycle": 5, "status": "pending" [23:27:03] can u paste the whole dump of the proposal [23:27:51] from listpropsals  [ { "version": 2, "hash": "acbf2823330053aac6de110ed6ee0db539be6a23b177f054004861d79945e4d4", "description": "IM LOOOOONNNNNGGGG, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque semper justo ac neque mollis, a cursus nisl placerat. Aliquam ipsum quam, congue vitae vulputate id, ullamcorper vel libero. Phasellus et tristique justo. Curabitur eu porta magna, vitae auctor libero. Fusce [23:27:52] tellus ipsum, aliquet nec consequat ut, dictum eget libero. Maecenas eu velit quam. Nunc ac libero in purus vestibulum feugiat quis nec urna. Donec faucibus consequat dignissim. Donec ornare turpis nec lobortis vestibulum. Vivamus lobortis vel massa ac ultrices. Ut vel eros in elit vehicula luctus vel vitae justo. Praesent quis semper nisi. Vivamus viverra blandit ex. Sed nec fringilla quam. Nulla condimentum rhoncus erat sit amet vulputate. [23:27:52] Phasellus viverra sagittis consequat. Sed dapibus augue ac enim dignissim, at consequat arcu ornare. Vestibulum facilisis pretium aliquet. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "requestedAmount": "0.00001", "notPaidYet": "0.00001", "userPaidFee": "1.00", "paymentAddress": "mgh7HRQU3FkmvhfGprKopFspkzLRMEUe84", "proposalDuration": 36000, "votesYes": 0, "votesNo": 0, "votingCycle": 5, [23:27:53] "status": "pending" } ] [23:28:15] getproposal [23:28:28] "version": 2, "hash": "acbf2823330053aac6de110ed6ee0db539be6a23b177f054004861d79945e4d4", "description": "IM LOOOOONNNNNGGGG, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque semper justo ac neque mollis, a cursus nisl placerat. Aliquam ipsum quam, congue vitae vulputate id, ullamcorper vel libero. Phasellus et tristique justo. Curabitur eu porta magna, vitae auctor libero. Fusce tellus ipsum, aliquet nec consequat [23:28:28] ut, dictum eget libero. Maecenas eu velit quam. Nunc ac libero in purus vestibulum feugiat quis nec urna. Donec faucibus consequat dignissim. Donec ornare turpis nec lobortis vestibulum. Vivamus lobortis vel massa ac ultrices. Ut vel eros in elit vehicula luctus vel vitae justo. Praesent quis semper nisi. Vivamus viverra blandit ex. Sed nec fringilla quam. Nulla condimentum rhoncus erat sit amet vulputate. Phasellus viverra sagittis consequat. [23:28:29] Sed dapibus augue ac enim dignissim, at consequat arcu ornare. Vestibulum facilisis pretium aliquet. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "requestedAmount": "0.00001", "notPaidYet": "0.00001", "userPaidFee": "1.00", "paymentAddress": "mgh7HRQU3FkmvhfGprKopFspkzLRMEUe84", "proposalDuration": 36000, "votesYes": 0, "votesNo": 0, "votingCycle": 5, "status": "pending" } [23:29:36] do you want what i broadcast? [23:31:04] cool thx ill review it now before getting in bed [23:31:13] np.... [23:31:29] let me know if you need anything else [23:47:16] @aguycalled looks like i have found another issue { "version": 2, "hash": "ced695607dcf8c30db82122509fb29053ec71d19c5bb525aefceed788a594d49", "description": "1000 Test", "requestedAmount": "0.00001", "notPaidYet": "0.00001", "userPaidFee": "1.00", "paymentAddress": "mgh7HRQU3FkmvhfGprKopFspkzLRMEUe84", "proposalDuration": 36000, "votesYes": 0, "votesNo": 0, "votingCycle": 0, "status": [23:47:17] "pending" }, { "version": 2, "hash": "6a83438573de5a88785c4085d65fe37f6170774d53621cf65a1bbf41c19c9f59", "description": "P Test 1", "requestedAmount": "1000.00", "notPaidYet": "1000.00", "userPaidFee": "0.0001", "paymentAddress": "mvSb2t5Piq2STxChHTCcn32faorzMLdC5M", "proposalDuration": 1532923766, "votesYes": 0, "votesNo": 0, "votingCycle": 0, "status": "pending" } ] [23:47:51] they are both meant to have 1000 requestedAmount [23:48:24] 6a83438573de5a88785c4085d65fe37f6170774d53621cf65a1bbf41c19c9f59 was made by the rpc command [23:48:31] which is correct [23:48:36] when u do the raw [23:48:43] u specify navoshis [23:48:50] instead of full units [23:48:51] ahhhhh [23:48:55] cool [23:49:36] then... its correct! - nice work 😎